Automation Case Study · Quote & Invoice Chasing · Trades

How Oakridge Installations Ltd reduced revenue leakage by systematically following up outstanding quotes and invoices.

The business had two different leaks: undecided quotes quietly dropped out of the sales process, while outstanding invoices consumed staff time and delayed cash collection. Both were addressed with structured follow-up.

Quote & Invoice Follow-Up Automation Trades / Installation / Home Services Birmingham, UK November 2025-February 2026
01 / The situation

The commercial leak existed inside the customer journey.

During the project, 226 outstanding or undecided quotes entered the automated follow-up process and 104 outstanding invoices were followed up automatically.

Business context

Trades / Installation / Home Services

The business had two different leaks: undecided quotes quietly dropped out of the sales process, while outstanding invoices consumed staff time and delayed cash collection. Both were addressed with structured follow-up.

ServiceQuote & Invoice Follow-Up Automation
LocationBirmingham, UK
PeriodNovember 2025-February 2026
Primary outcome£46,980
02 / Before and after

Show exactly where the operational handover changed.

Automation case studies work best when the reader can see the difference between the old operating route and the new one.

Before
01
Quote sentThe prospect receives pricing.
02
No structured next actionFollow-up timing depends on staff availability.
03
Viable quotes go quietSome undecided prospects disappear from view.
04
Invoices need manual chasingStaff repeatedly spend time requesting payment.
After
01
Quote / invoice status recordedThe system knows what is outstanding.
02
Follow-up runs by status and timingCustomers receive structured reminders.
03
Responses return to the teamRestarted conversations become visible again.
04
Humans handle exceptionsStaff focus on active sales or payment issues, not repetitive chasing.
03 / What we found

The diagnosis focused on the operating gap, not the software.

The system was designed around the commercial failure point first, then the workflow and CRM logic followed.

01 / Quote leakage

Quote leakage

Undecided quotes had no consistent follow-up rhythm.

02 / Sales visibility

Sales visibility

Quiet opportunities could fall out of attention.

03 / Payment delay

Payment delay

Average payment time was 21.6 days.

04 / Admin cost

Admin cost

Manual payment chasing consumed about 6 hours each week.

05 / Prioritisation

Prioritisation

Staff time was spent on repetitive reminders instead of exceptions.

06 / Commercial split

Commercial split

Quote recovery and payment collection were separate problems needing separate logic.

04 / The strategy

Automate the repeatable parts while keeping commercial judgement human.

The strongest automation work removes delay, inconsistency and forgotten next actions without pretending software should replace the team.

Decision 01

Automate the predictable reminders

Use status and time-based follow-up for routine quote and invoice chasing.

Decision 02

Return engaged prospects to humans

Automation should reopen the conversation, not try to close complex installation work itself.

Decision 03

Treat cash collection and quote recovery as separate outcomes

Measure recovered sales and payment-time improvement independently.

05 / What changed

The implementation followed the commercial priority.

The work is grouped into the operational phases that changed the customer or sales journey.

Phase 01

Quote follow-up

Created automated sequences for undecided and stalled quotations.

Phase 02

Conversation recovery

Surfaced prospects who replied or re-engaged for human sales follow-up.

Phase 03

Invoice reminders

Automated routine outstanding-payment follow-up.

Phase 04

Exception handling

Left disputed, complex or sensitive cases for staff intervention.

06 / Commercial logic

Make the revenue or operational logic visible.

226 quotes followed up→47 conversations restarted→29 converted into work→29 × £1,620→£46,980 recovered sales→21.6d → 13.8d payment time→≈4 admin hours saved weekly
07 / Results

Lead with the commercial result, then show the operating metrics behind it.

The primary result is prominent, while supporting metrics explain how the system produced the change.

Recovered quote revenue£46,98029 recovered jobs × £1,620
Quotes converted29Previously stalled opportunities
Payment time reduction7.8 days21.6 days to 13.8 days
Admin time saved≈4h / weekPayment chasing reduced from ~6h to ~2h
08 / What changed commercially

The system improved what happened to opportunities already inside the business.

The automation solved two different commercial problems. It returned stalled quotes to the sales process, producing £46,980 in recovered sales, while routine invoice follow-up shortened average collection time by 7.8 days and reduced repetitive admin.

Positioning rule

The case study credits the system for making opportunities faster, more visible or more consistently followed up. It does not imply that automation alone created the original market demand.

Have a similar operational gap?

Find where good enquiries, quotes or customers are being lost between one step and the next.

A Free Health Check gives you a practical starting point before committing to a larger automation project.